1 Our new Deepseek-based AI Says

jasminflower1 edited this page 2025-02-12 03:38:00 +08:00

Our brand-new Deepseek-based AI says "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl forecasts from our new Deepseek-based AI trained to be better at forecasting

Share this post

No one can predict the future but at Lightning Rod Labs we are training AI to provide it its best shot. With approximately date news and a little however tough 14 Billion criterion model, our AI is boldly predicting the unforeseeable. Join us as we attempt to respond to mankind's toughest questions.

Super Bowl Sunday is almost upon us and, simply as 2 years earlier, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread presently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, there remain lots of pushing questions that are less simple to determine. Our business, Lightning arrester Labs, has actually been mining concerns from places like polymarket.com and training a large language model to be much better at predicting the future (and have actually seen some intriguing enhancements - research study paper inbound). This week we turned its cold, computing eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can give us some insight into the finer points of what we can anticipate this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world register for my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion parameter model which is in fact on the smaller sized side. (Some quotes recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION specifications and trained using 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its understanding cutoff is from many months earlier so we have constructed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we offer the news and watch as the AI reasons its method through unidentified area to make its best forecast possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We postured the following questions to our AI and determined its action. While we have seen prediction improvements from our training, utilize these estimates for prop wagering at your own hazard.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% possibility

And so it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI believes Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock solid, however a little too personal for a post-Super Bowl proposal. Plus got ta factor in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an awkward proposition ...

First, bybio.co I'll take a look at the key points from the articles. Travis has actually remained in a relationship with Taylor given that 2023. He's a big football star, and she's been encouraging of his career, attending his games. They appear to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has even invited her loved ones to the Super Bowl, showing her commitment.

Some fans are thrilled, while others, especially Swifties, are a bit uncertain, particularly provided comments Travis made about Donald Trump participating in the Super Bowl. That has triggered some Swifties to question how suitable Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple seems to be keeping their relationship private and not resolving the speculation straight.

I think the key points are the speculation and his evasive answers. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an essential event, the chances and his responses recommend it's more of a possibility instead of a certainty. I 'd estimate a low possibility, possibly around 5%, thinking about all aspects.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the super bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% chance

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from using their signature "tush-push" move, now its simply a various front-tush being pushed. Will an AI comprehend what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even know what a "tush" is? Will it consider that the Chiefs stopped (controversy aside) Josh Allen's similar efforts? Appears like our AI thinks they'll be utilizing Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again throughout this game.

Alright, I'm trying to find out the probability that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the Super Bowl. First, I need to comprehend just what a "tush-push" is. From the short articles, it looks like it's a method where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to push off protectors. It's compared to pushing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and method.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to carry out the move. The article points out that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this method, which is pretty high. ... I also require to consider the protective techniques of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs understand the Eagles' "tush-push" method, they might adjust their defense appropriately, which could either increase or reduce the number of times the Eagles utilize it.

Considering that more than 5 seems like a considerable number but possible offered their confidence, I would estimate a probability around 60-70% opportunity. This represents their preparation, self-confidence in the method, and the probability that they'll utilize it a number of times, specifically if it's effective early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime show performance?

AI Final Prediction: 65% chance

While our AI may not be like us when it pertains to consciousness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has viewpoints on Kendrick Lamar. It was quite uncertain, waffling backward and forward, however in the end it believes Kendrick isn't going to back down from a fight.

From the posts, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of criticizing Trump. He's done this in his songs, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a statement throughout a previous halftime show when Trump existed in 2018. That seems significant since it shows he's done it previously, so perhaps he'll do it again. But wait, looking at more current short articles, it points out that Lamar is moving far from political declarations and focusing more on individual expression. That could mean he's less most likely to address Trump this time.

However, he's also associated with a feud with Drake, which might offer him reasons to make some public declarations, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal problems surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a defamation fit from Drake, so maybe he bewares about consisting of any questionable songs in the performance. But considering that he won the Grammys for that track, he might still want to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a high-profile occasion, Lamar may feel forced to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to prevent political declarations during the halftime program, so there's a danger that such content might be limited or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making vibrant relocations on huge stages. He's the first solo rap act to heading the halftime show, which might provide him more imaginative flexibility. Plus, his past behavior suggests he's not shy about expressing his opinions, even in public efficiencies.

But I also keep in mind reading that Lamar expressed fatigue about slamming Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might show he's less motivated to raise Trump this time around, specifically if he's focusing on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past habits, existing shifts in focus, legal problems, and the occasion's context-the probability appears to be reasonably high, perhaps around 65%.

Will Andy Reid eat a cheeseburger on screen after the extremely bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% opportunity

Lets be honest, Andy Reid enjoys cheeseburgers. And who does not? Will the reality that our AI has never tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its prediction? Appears like theres somewhat of a possibility that if the chiefs taste success, ura.cc Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the posts, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid eating a cheeseburger during a Super Bowl celebration. Bradshaw later said sorry for the joke, stating he didn't imply to cause offense and larsaluarna.se that he actually discovered it amusing himself. Reid appeared to take it in stride, which may suggest he's the type to laugh it off instead of getting upset.

Taking a look at the articles, it points out that Andy Reid is a food lover and enjoys cheeseburgers. There's an article specifically about his love for food, which recommends that he's a person who delights in eating, specifically with his team. So, if there were strategies to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, particularly if the situation is on screen for a celebration.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% opportunity

"Tails never ever fails?" You can't fool the devices !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have been anticipating the coin toss and 53% are anticipating heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 very bowls. Potentially financially rewarding? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be fooled and believes anything can take place when that coin goes in the air.

Okay, so I'm trying to determine the probability that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I know that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, but there's some historical information that may influence this forecast.

First, I go through the articles offered. They all discuss the historic stats of Super Bowl coin tosses. It appears like tails has come up more frequently than heads traditionally. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the outcome 30 times, which is about 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based purely on history, tails has a small edge, but it's not a substantial distinction.

However, I remember that the result of a coin toss is generally considered random. The slight historical edge for tails might be due to opportunity. But when making predictions, in some cases people weigh historic data even if it's not statistically significant. So, I ought to think about whether this historical bias must affect the probability.

After thinking of it, I choose that while the historic data shows a minor choice for tails, it's not statistically substantial adequate to move the possibility far from 0.5. So, I'll choose 0.5 as the probability, acknowledging that the small historic edge exists however does not bypass the reality that each toss is an independent 50/50 occasion.

Will the to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% opportunity

We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na help him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I promise we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training information) I would most likely think the very same. BUT, its authorities now because our AI states the opportunities are only 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still sort of high when it pertains to scams on a national scale). Appears like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm trying to figure out the likelihood that the referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a quite serious accusation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a lot of posts that discuss conspiracy theories suggesting referees are prejudiced towards the Chiefs. People are indicating some doubtful calls in current video games, especially the AFC Championship Game. That does seem to spark some uncertainty. I can see why fans may get irritated when their team loses due to what they perceive as bad officiating.

But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "outrageous" and "absurd." They state there's no evidence of organized predisposition. That's a strong statement from the people in charge. If they're rejecting it, it might indicate there's no real basis or they would have resolved it in a different way if there was some truth to it.

Looking at the articles, numerous sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the authorities are against these claims, drapia.org and some even called them insulting. They also mentioned that analytical analysis does not show any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For instance, Mike Pereira from FOX said data reveals the Chiefs have been penalized more given that 2022. That's fascinating because if they were getting special treatment, you might expect less penalties, right?

...

So, putting all of it together, the likelihood that referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is most likely really low. Maybe not zero due to the fact that you can't eliminate every possibility, however incredibly unlikely.

Summary

There you have it everyone, is it even worth watching the video game still? I guess I'll have to wait and see how the game turns out before we release this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for a great video game! And hello, if it ends up our AI was incorrect about everything, a minimum of it can gain from this.